Why this Muslim is pushing back against Andrew Tate | Social Media

In late October, a video went viral on Twitter, exhibiting former British kickboxer Andrew Tate learning easy methods to pray like a Muslim from a buddy and fellow MMA fighter, Tam Khan. Days later, Khan confirmed Tate’s conversion to Islam.

It was a blow to Muslim girls like myself, and to oldsters and others in the neighborhood who had been respiratory a sigh of aid since Tate was banned throughout each main social media platform in August. Our massive concern: this would possibly cement his reputation with some Muslim males. It’s a fear that has solely been amplified by Elon Musk’s choice to reinstate Tate’s Twitter account.

In considered one of Tate’s most infamous movies, he talks about how he would reply if a girl was to accuse him of dishonest: “It’s bang out the machete, growth in her face and grip her by the neck. Shut up b**** … slap, slap, seize, choke,” he says. Tate has beforehand mentioned in a tweet that “should you put your self ready to be raped, you should bear some accountability”.

Feedback like these have made Tate a central determine in digital purple capsule tradition and its more and more violent overtones. The time period, “take the purple capsule”, is a popular culture reference taken from the 1999 sci-fi film The Matrix; it means opening your eyes to the reality. What was really a transgender allegory in keeping with the movie’s creator Lily Wachowski is now used to explain a digital motion of primarily white ultraconservative males who imagine that they’re victims of feminism and are mistreated by society.

What has been significantly worrying for a lot of within the Muslim group within the West is that Tate has grow to be a job mannequin for some Muslim males, particularly after expressing his admiration for Islam on this YouTube video. These males have taken to Twitter, in a nook of the social media platform that some in the neighborhood have nicknamed MT or Muslim Twitter, to align themselves with Tate and his views.

However many Muslims — each ladies and men — are additionally pushing again in opposition to this pattern, warning of the dangers concerned if the toxic materials being peddled by the likes of Tate positive aspects acceptance amongst broader sections of the group’s youth.

As secondary faculty instructor Nadeine Asbali wrote within the New Statesman in August, Tate’s content material “has its hooks” into Muslim boys, a few of whom share his content material on social media. “Figures reminiscent of Tate even reward Muslims, inflicting their very own patriarchal concepts onto a religion that’s predicated on the very reverse,” she wrote.

Outstanding Muslim intellectuals within the West — reminiscent of creator Khaled Beydoun and Shabana Mir, professor at Chicago’s American Islamic Faculty — have additionally publicly expressed worries concerning the rise of purple capsule tradition amongst younger Muslim males.

Others have been extra direct in condemning the misogyny of males like Tate and in explaining how their phrases and actions contradict the teachings of Islam.

Bilal Ware, professor of historical past on the College of California in Santa Barbara, posted a sequence of Instagram posts criticising da’wah influencers who’ve been internet hosting Tate on their podcasts and in YouTube movies. “Giving platforms to unrepentant misogynists, whether or not converts or lifelong believers sends a transparent message: abusers welcome.” He additionally took a stance in opposition to poisonous masculinity by saying, “The Muslim ‘manosphere’ has grow to be a protect for emasculated, intimidated males to play robust by bullying girls. This isn’t Islam.”

Joseph Lumbard, an affiliate professor of Quran research on the Hamad Bin Khalifa College in Doha, has been tweeting to problem the suggestion that by changing to Islam, Tate’s repute is totally rehabilitated — regardless of no denouncement of his violent misogyny. “Too many Muslim males are looking for to present him a cross, claiming ḥusn al-ẓann [having a good opinion] and that Islam wipes away all sins,” Lumbard tweeted on October 29. “These are certainly essential Islamic ideas that apply within the overwhelming majority of circumstances, however not when they’re employed to excuse violent misogyny, grifting, and all method of fisq [wickedness] and fasād [corruption] that AT’s [Andrew Tate’s] social media platforms proceed to advertise.”

This pushback from inside the group — and particularly from lecturers and students — is important as a result of Tate’s reputation represents a broader pattern of purple capsule tradition taking maintain amongst some Muslim males.

Lately, digital platforms like Twitter and Reddit have given rise to what the Muslim on-line group calls “mincels” – Muslim incels. They use Twitter and Redditt threads to troll Muslim girls on-line, blaming single moms for the ills of society, saying {that a} man has the proper to beat his spouse, and calling for the return of feminine concubinage and advocating a “no-strings-attached nikah”.

The irony is that a lot of these spreading purple capsule tradition on-line belong to a white, ultra-far-right worldview that’s typically overtly Islamophobic.

I’m each cautious and sceptical of Tate’s conversion, as a result of I query what it was that attracted him to my religion. Take into account his earlier video, the place he reacted to Will Smith’s “purple desk speak” along with his spouse Jada Pinkett-Smith relating to her infidelity by saying that watching the clip had made him need to convert to Islam as a result of in a Muslim nation she would have been stoned to demise. I believe that it’s white Islamophobic and Orientalist misperceptions of Islam as being a faith that allows violence in direction of girls which can be the idea for Tate’s conversion. “I’m going to seek out myself a pleasant Islamic-a** spouse, and construct up an enormous pile of rocks in case she will get recent,” Tate says on the finish of the video.

I fear that Tate is making the most of his reputation amongst alt-right Muslim males to rehabilitate his picture and rebrand himself.

We as a group must acknowledge that we additionally maintain a part of the blame for Tate’s reputation amongst a few of our male youth. Our madrassas, Saturday colleges and households are sometimes missing in terms of educating our Muslim youth on wholesome relationships and on respecting women and girls from a younger age.

We want increasingly more Muslim males to hitch us in pushing again on misogyny in all its varieties — on-line, on campus, at residence, on the streets, and within the masjid.

The views expressed on this article are the creator’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

The murder of Somalia’s brave journalists must stop | Media

Somalia can lay declare – by way of no alternative of its personal folks – to being the most harmful nation for journalists in Africa. Information collected by the Worldwide Federation of Journalists (IFJ) and the testimonies of native journalists exhibit that media rights are flagrantly violated each day. Threats and violent actions meant to terrorise media practitioners are routine. The concept is easy: to silence them.

On November 2, the world celebrates the Worldwide Day to Finish Impunity for Crimes towards Journalists, a United Nations-recognised occasion. There are few different nations the place this problem has the identical chilling significance because it does in Somalia.

In response to knowledge collated by the Nationwide Union of Somali Journalists (NUSOJ), 54 journalists have been murdered over the previous decade. The latest sufferer, TV journalist Mohamed Isse Hassan was killed on October 29 in a automobile bombing whereas he and others have been overlaying one other explosion within the capital Mogadishu. The dual bombings killed greater than 100 folks in complete.

But, barring one conviction earlier this yr, these chargeable for these killings have by no means been delivered to justice. Nor have those that ordered the assassinations. An finish to this marketing campaign of terror remains to be nowhere in sight.

Some Somali journalists have died in a hail of bullets, others have misplaced their lives in suicide bomb assaults, and a few others have been killed within the line of obligation – as occurred on October 29. Some have been despatched loss of life threats and lived in worry till their killers lastly tracked them down. Others have been attacked with out warning.

Along with the appalling loss of life toll, 50 journalists have been severely injured since 2012. That features two journalists who have been wounded on October 29.

Many others – each women and men – have confronted arrests, threats and harassment. There isn’t a expectation that, as soon as arrested, a journalist will obtain a good trial. Generally, the infamous phrases “convicted as charged” are pronounced.

Amid the battle between completely different armed teams and the federal government that continues to rage within the nation, there’s a lack of political will from any main actor to finish this lethal violence towards journalists. Every political facet needs to manage and manipulate information and data, and unbiased and significant journalism attracts retaliation. There may be an unspoken compact between political forces that there want be no worry of any accountability for such crimes.

Regardless of these dangers, journalists – who’re largely younger adults – are becoming a member of each government-controlled and personal media. Information organisations are mushrooming and there’s a rising unbiased media panorama. They symbolize hope for a greater future and their optimism should not be extinguished.

Feminine reporters particularly moreover face the specter of gender-based violence and harassment. On social media, feminine journalists routinely obtain messages warning them that they are going to be killed or raped in the event that they pursue a specific line of reporting.

The psychological wellbeing of journalists is one other essential security problem. Along with overlaying tales in high-risk, hostile environments, many Somali journalists are traumatised by fixed threats and harassment. The worry that they might be intentionally focused at any time provides to their sense of unease.

The widespread acceptance of impunity for individuals who assault journalists in Somalia is a serious trigger for concern. In the meantime, the federal government makes use of out of date, oppressive legal guidelines – just like the nation’s archaic 1964 penal code that UN consultants have additionally criticised (PDF) – to legally prosecute journalists reasonably than those that hound them.

This, in flip, encourages people throughout the judicial system – together with within the provinces away from Mogadishu – and non-state actors to imagine that they will harass and assault journalists with none adversarial penalties.

With out agency political will, it’s unlikely that this violence will abate.

In September, Somali journalists adopted a Nationwide Motion Plan on the Security of Journalists, backed by the African Union, UNESCO, the Worldwide Labour Group and NUSOJ. The plan – a Somali-led, Somali-owned, journalist-centred blueprint – addresses urgent occupational security and safety points. It encompasses the whole lot from security abilities for journalists and partnerships for the authorized and bodily defence of media professionals, to methods to tackle gender-based violence towards ladies journalists and the broader tradition of impunity inside which assaults proceed.

What’s now required is the vigorous implementation of that plan by all sectors of society, not simply journalists. The federal authorities, state governments and judiciary too should embrace the plan. The time for grief and condolences alone is over. It’s time to behave.

The views expressed on this article are the writer’s personal and don’t essentially mirror Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.

New Delhi gives itself power over social media content moderation | Business and Economy News

New guidelines present Indian authorities management over content material moderation selections that social media companies make.

The Indian authorities has introduced modifications to its data expertise guidelines that can apply to social media firms, a transfer prone to be seen as reining in large tech companies.

Beneath the amended guidelines, which had been introduced on Friday, a authorities panel shall be fashioned to listen to complaints from customers about content material moderation selections by social media platforms. This successfully provides the federal government management over the content material moderation selections that social media firms make.

The Web Freedom Basis, a nonprofit that advocates for digital rights, known as the proposed panel “basically a authorities censorship physique for social media that can make bureaucrats arbiters of our on-line free speech”.

One of many considerations raised by the inspiration is that the existence of the panel “will incentivise platforms to take away/suppress/label any speech unpalatable to the federal government, or these exerting political strain”.

The muse additionally expressed concern that the federal government may even be able to pressure social media platforms to show content material that the platforms have discovered to violate their norms.

“Opaque and arbitrary strategies of selecting appeals for his or her assessment, the shortage of belief in an all Govt physique, the flexibility of the federal government to affect content material moderation selections in a non-transparent method” are simply among the different considerations the inspiration flagged in regards to the amended guidelines.

Tightening guidelines

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s authorities has had strained relations with many large tech firms, and New Delhi has been tightening regulation of companies reminiscent of Fb, YouTube and Twitter.

Tensions over social media content material selections has been a very thorny difficulty in India with firms usually receiving takedown requests from the federal government or eradicating content material proactively.

Social media companies are already required to have an in-house grievance redress officer and to designate executives to coordinate with regulation enforcement officers.

Beneath the amended guidelines, the businesses can be required to acknowledge complaints from customers inside 24 hours and resolve them inside 15 days or 72 hours in case of an data takedown request.

In June, the federal government had issued draft modifications to the IT regulation that will require firms to “respect the rights accorded to the residents beneath the structure of India”. It had additionally proposed establishing a authorities panel.

India’s authorities is worried that customers upset with selections to have their content material taken down do not need a correct system to attraction in opposition to these selections and their solely authorized recourse is to go to court docket.

“Quite a lot of (expertise) Intermediaries have acted in violation of constitutional rights of Indian residents,” the federal government stated in June, with out naming any firm or particular rights.

The federal government panel will include a chairperson and two full-time members, of which two shall be unbiased members.

Filipino journalist Percival Mabasa shot dead in ‘brazen’ attack | Media News

The 63-year-old radio broadcaster, also called Percy Lapid, was killed close to his house in suburban Manila.

Media teams and press freedom activists within the Philippines have condemned the killing of journalist Percival Mabasa, who was fatally shot close to his house within the nation’s capital.

The 63-year-old radio broadcaster, who was also called Percy Lapid, was killed by two assailants on a bike on the gate of a residential compound within the Las Pinas space of suburban Manila on Monday evening, police stated on Tuesday.

In a press release, the Nationwide Union of Journalists of the Philippines stated Mabasa’s killing confirmed that “journalism stays a harmful career” within the nation.

“That the incident happened in Metro Manila signifies how brazen the perpetrators have been, and the way authorities have failed to guard journalists in addition to atypical residents from hurt,” it added.

Mabasa had been crucial of “red-tagging” – accusing somebody of being a communist sympathiser – in addition to on-line playing operations and misinformation round martial legislation, the union stated. He was additionally an outspoken critic of former President Rodrigo Duterte in addition to insurance policies and officers within the authorities of his successor, Ferdinand Marcos Jr, it added.

There was no rapid remark by the federal government, whereas police pledged to carry the perpetrators to account.

“We’re not discounting the likelihood that the capturing may very well be associated to the sufferer’s work in media,” native police chief Jaime Santos stated in a press release.

Mabasa’s household known as his killing a “deplorable crime” and demanded “his cowardly assassins be dropped at justice”, in line with studies.

Rights group Karapatan described him as “one of many nation’s fiercest truth-tellers”.

The Worldwide Federation of Journalists additionally condemned Mabasa’s killing and known as on the federal government to research the case.

“He’s the most recent in a protracted listing of journalists killed within the nation,” it stated.

Mabasa’s killing adopted the deadly stabbing final month of radio journalist Rey Blanco within the central Philippines.

The Philippines has one in all Asia’s most liberal media environments, however it stays of the world’s most harmful locations for journalists, notably in its provinces.

At the very least 187 journalists have been killed previously 35 years within the Philippines, in line with worldwide watchdog Reporters With out Borders, together with 32 in a single incident in 2009.