Politician slaps a woman MP in Senegal parliament, sparking brawl | Government News

Tensions have grown between ruling and opposition politicians since legislative elections in July when main coalition misplaced its snug majority.

A violent brawl broke out in Senegal’s parliament after a male opposition legislator slapped a feminine colleague within the face, tv footage confirmed, amid rising acrimony between ruling and opposition occasion politicians.

Throughout a funds presentation on Thursday, opposition member of parliament Massata Samb walked over and slapped Amy Ndiaye Gniby of the ruling Benno Bokk Yakaar (BBY) coalition, setting off a flurry of scuffles.

Gniby threw a chair again at Samb earlier than one other MP tackled her to the ground. The session was suspended as politicians traded blows, accusations and insults.

Tensions have grown between ruling and opposition politicians since a July legislative election wherein the ruling occasion misplaced its snug majority, broken partially by considerations President Macky Sall will search a 3rd time period in 2024.

Sall has refused to state clearly whether or not he plans to run for a 3rd time period, a transfer the opposition says could be in breach of time period limits and an earlier promise.

Supporters of Sall, aged 60, argue a constitutional reform reset the clock, permitting him to run once more.

One other scuffle broke out in September when parliament convened for the primary time after the election as legislators fought over management of the home.

Samb on Thursday was addressing the meeting about feedback Gniby remodeled the weekend wherein she criticised a non secular chief against a 3rd Sall time period.

“Mister President, a deputy has stood in entrance of this tribune to insult somebody’s marabout [spiritual leader],” mentioned Samb.

Gniby scoffed at his remarks and declared she didn’t care, after which Samb walked over and hit her.

Footage of the combat has been shared extensively on social media, sparking debate about violence in opposition to girls.

Japan court upholds ban on same-sex marriage but offers hope | LGBTQ News

A courtroom in Japan’s capital has upheld a ban on same-sex marriage however stated an absence of authorized safety for same-sex households violated their human rights.

Japan is the one G7 nation that doesn’t enable same-sex marriage and its structure defines marriage as based mostly on the mutual consent of each sexes.

In Wednesday’s ruling, the Tokyo district courtroom stated the ban was constitutional however added that “the present lack of authorized framework that enables same-sex companions to grow to be household is a critical menace and impediment” to particular person dignity.

This creates an “unconstitutional state of affairs”, the courtroom stated.

Nobuhito Sawasaki, one of many attorneys concerned within the case, referred to as the choice “a reasonably optimistic ruling”.

“Whereas marriage stays between a person and a lady, and the ruling supported that, it additionally stated that the present state of affairs with no authorized protections for same-sex households is just not good, and advised one thing have to be achieved about it,” he informed the Reuters information company.

Japan doesn’t allow same-sex {couples} to marry or inherit one another’s property, corresponding to a shared house, and denies them parental rights to one another’s kids – even hospital visits will be troublesome. Although partnership certificates from municipalities cowl about 60 p.c of Japan’s inhabitants, they don’t give same-sex {couples} the identical rights loved by heterosexual {couples}.

The Tokyo ruling guarantees to be influential because the capital has an outsized affect on the remainder of Japan.

It had been keenly awaited after hopes had been raised by a 2021 ruling within the metropolis of Sapporo that the same-sex marriage ban was unconstitutional, though one other determination in Osaka in June upheld the ban.

Plaintiffs hold placards that read read "A step towards Marriage Equality".
Japan is the one G7 nation that doesn’t enable same-sex marriage [Kim Kyung-Hoon/ Reuters]

The eight plaintiffs within the Tokyo case had stated the ban contravened their human rights and demanded damages of 1 million yen ($7,215), which the courtroom rejected.

“That is onerous to just accept,” stated Gon Matsunaka, head of the activist group Marriage for All Japan.

Each heterosexual and same-sex {couples} ought to be capable to profit equally from the system of marriage, as everyone seems to be equal underneath the legislation, he added. “It [the ruling] clearly stated that isn’t attainable.”

But the popularity that same-sex households lacked authorized protections was “a giant step”, he stated.

‘That is just the start’

The plaintiffs, who unfurled a banner outdoors the courtroom that learn “A step ahead for Marriage Equality” after the ruling, stated they had been inspired.

“There have been elements of this that had been disappointing however elements of it gave me hope,” stated one among them, Katsu, who gave solely his first title.

Two extra circumstances are pending in Japan and activists and attorneys hope an accumulation of judicial selections supporting same-sex marriage will ultimately push legislators to vary the system, even when that is unlikely to occur quickly.

Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s conservative ruling get together has revealed no plans but to assessment the matter or suggest adjustments however a number of senior members assist same-sex marriage.

Plaintiff Chizuka Oe stated she hoped Wednesday’s ruling would spur a debate within the Japanese parliament.

“I used to be glad that the ruling acknowledged we’ve got a proper to be households,” she informed a information convention, including that her accomplice of greater than 20 years “is my invaluable household it doesn’t matter what anybody says”.

Oe stated the combat would proceed till there was actual progress. “That is just the start,” she stated.

Supporters hold a banner that says 'Marriage for all Japan'
Supporters wait outdoors the courtroom for the ruling on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage, in Tokyo, Japan, November 30, 2022 [Kim Kyung-Hoon/ Reuters]

Amnesty Worldwide additionally referred to as the Tokyo courtroom’s acknowledgement of the rights of same-sex {couples} to have households as “a trigger for hope”.

“This isn’t the ruling the LGBTI group needed, however it’s nonetheless an essential step ahead for same-sex {couples} and LGBTI rights in Japan,” stated Amnesty’s East Asia Researcher Boram Jang. “However, far more must be achieved to fight the discrimination confronted by LGBTI individuals in Japanese society. It’s time for the federal government to vary course on LGBTI rights.”

Latest years have seen Japan take small steps in the direction of embracing sexual range.

Tokyo started issuing certificates recognising same-sex {couples} this month, permitting them to use for public housing in the identical method as married {couples}, get pleasure from entry to medical information and be named beneficiaries in automotive and life insurance coverage. Since 2015, greater than 200 smaller cities have taken related steps however they aren’t legally binding and nonetheless not the identical as in marriage.

The state of affairs has restricted the expertise pool for international corporations, say teams such because the American Chamber of Commerce in Japan.

“Excited about the way forward for their lives, they don’t see something in Japan,” stated Masa Yanagisawa, head of prime companies at financial institution Goldman Sachs and a member of the group Marriage for All Japan.

“So that they transfer to extra pleasant jurisdictions, like america.”

The Tokyo courtroom ruling got here a day after the US Senate handed a same-sex marriage safety invoice and Singapore lifted a ban on homosexual intercourse however restricted the prospects for legalising same-sex marriage.